I REALLY hope The Whip is wrong in predicting that Labour strategists are planning to resort to the failed “Tory toff” tactics during the general election.

It didn’t work in Crewe and it won’t work in a nationwide contest. And I’m not against it just because it’s ineffective: even if I thought people would respond positively, I would still be against it.

But for most of my 25 years in the Labour Party I’ve argued for the notion that class warfare is irrelevant. And I’ve argued that Labour can only win by being the party of aspiration. Slagging people off for being wealthy and for having privileged backgrounds would be utterly self-defeating — literally and figuratively.

Cameron and Osborne would be bad for Britain, not because they used to be members of the Bullingdon Club or are former public schoolboys or whatever, but because their political philosophy and policies will damage and divide our nation.

And by focussing on class, we would effectively be conceding that we don’t have anything to say about Tory policies."

My response is this;

I agree that it was a poorly employed tactic in Crewe, but to just dismiss class as no longer an issue is wrong. The landscape may have changed but the new one has new problems.

The demonisation of the underclass by the right-wing is damaging and must be stopped. They need help not labels. The crazed pursuit of the middle class vote by all of us must stop, it is damaging politics. It leaves us seeking to serve the majority and excluding the groups we are duty bound to protect. And the ruling class image so crystal clear in Cameron, Osborne and Hannan but as worrying in some of our own ministers who were educated and trained into political office rather than thrust by events they could not ignore, will destroy politics entirely.
Representatives of the people must BE representative of the people. To allow the stately progression of the born wealthy, clique educated and socially privileged into government without highlighting that fundamental flaw in their credentials, that exclusive separation from the people they ‘represent’ would be unforgivable.

If we can do that rationally, by making the case, without following candidates round dressed as Butlers, then I don’t think it is a bad thing. More than ever, politicians need to be brought closer to the people, to come from the people, to be the people. That’s what democracy was supposed to be, not a form of elected aristocracy, which is what we are becoming.